<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rethinking Nuclear for a Green World</title>
	<link>http://blog.ideavolcano.com/2007/12/13/gerard-ba-thinks-nuclear-idea-should-not-go-to-waste/</link>
	<description>read, share, suggest, and use cracking business ideas</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: cornish bob</title>
		<link>http://blog.ideavolcano.com/2007/12/13/gerard-ba-thinks-nuclear-idea-should-not-go-to-waste/#comment-633</link>
		<author>cornish bob</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ideavolcano.com/2007/12/13/gerard-ba-thinks-nuclear-idea-should-not-go-to-waste/#comment-633</guid>
					<description>would making a hole to the lava create a new volcano and be difficult to "put stuff in" to go back down again?



on the other hand, if you had a reliable means of accessing the heat of the core as they do in some locations, you've got yourself an incredibly efficient means of creating electricity and you can stop using nuke waste!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>would making a hole to the lava create a new volcano and be difficult to &#8220;put stuff in&#8221; to go back down again?</p>
<p>on the other hand, if you had a reliable means of accessing the heat of the core as they do in some locations, you&#8217;ve got yourself an incredibly efficient means of creating electricity and you can stop using nuke waste!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerard Baird</title>
		<link>http://blog.ideavolcano.com/2007/12/13/gerard-ba-thinks-nuclear-idea-should-not-go-to-waste/#comment-641</link>
		<author>Gerard Baird</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ideavolcano.com/2007/12/13/gerard-ba-thinks-nuclear-idea-should-not-go-to-waste/#comment-641</guid>
					<description>Answer to first question No. These convection currents have been mapped and are stable for thousands of years.

The second part means that waste could be brought to the site from remote reactors that are supplying energy to other parts of the world where the earths crust is a lot thicker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Answer to first question No. These convection currents have been mapped and are stable for thousands of years.</p>
<p>The second part means that waste could be brought to the site from remote reactors that are supplying energy to other parts of the world where the earths crust is a lot thicker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://blog.ideavolcano.com/2007/12/13/gerard-ba-thinks-nuclear-idea-should-not-go-to-waste/#comment-706</link>
		<author>JC</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ideavolcano.com/2007/12/13/gerard-ba-thinks-nuclear-idea-should-not-go-to-waste/#comment-706</guid>
					<description>Besides anything else, these currents are found in the *inner* mantle. That starts between two hundred and two thousand miles beneath the earth's surface. Drilling that deep is far beyond current technology.

Re cornish bob's comments: if you drilled deep enough to hit the liquid part of the mantle, yes you would have hot incredibly high pressure liquid rock spurting in your face. Gerald is right in saying this wouldn't disrupt the current; but it would be far beyond the capabilities of current engineering to produce machinery that could insert waste or even survive those conditions.

Overall, probably a 30th century answer to 21st century problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besides anything else, these currents are found in the *inner* mantle. That starts between two hundred and two thousand miles beneath the earth&#8217;s surface. Drilling that deep is far beyond current technology.</p>
<p>Re cornish bob&#8217;s comments: if you drilled deep enough to hit the liquid part of the mantle, yes you would have hot incredibly high pressure liquid rock spurting in your face. Gerald is right in saying this wouldn&#8217;t disrupt the current; but it would be far beyond the capabilities of current engineering to produce machinery that could insert waste or even survive those conditions.</p>
<p>Overall, probably a 30th century answer to 21st century problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jojo</title>
		<link>http://blog.ideavolcano.com/2007/12/13/gerard-ba-thinks-nuclear-idea-should-not-go-to-waste/#comment-708</link>
		<author>jojo</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 03:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ideavolcano.com/2007/12/13/gerard-ba-thinks-nuclear-idea-should-not-go-to-waste/#comment-708</guid>
					<description>what is the mantal on a volcano</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is the mantal on a volcano</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exateedstaw</title>
		<link>http://blog.ideavolcano.com/2007/12/13/gerard-ba-thinks-nuclear-idea-should-not-go-to-waste/#comment-713</link>
		<author>Exateedstaw</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 02:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ideavolcano.com/2007/12/13/gerard-ba-thinks-nuclear-idea-should-not-go-to-waste/#comment-713</guid>
					<description>Hello,
I am, Robert
some nice posts here
check out my site:

http://wVngrJtnI.spaces.live.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
I am, Robert<br />
some nice posts here<br />
check out my site:</p>
<p><a href="http://wVngrJtnI.spaces.live.com/" rel="nofollow">http://wVngrJtnI.spaces.live.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
